Difference between revisions of "Education"
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
[http://scratch.mit.edu/ Scratch] is a new programming language that makes it easy to create your own interactive stories, animations, games, music, and art -- and share your creations on the web. | [http://scratch.mit.edu/ Scratch] is a new programming language that makes it easy to create your own interactive stories, animations, games, music, and art -- and share your creations on the web. | ||
[https://courses.fee.org/ Foundation for Economic Freedom] courses | |||
=== Reasons to home school === | === Reasons to home school === | ||
| Line 26: | Line 28: | ||
[http://www.lpi.org/eng Linux Professional Institute] has various levels of certification with [http://www.lpi.org/eng/certification/the_lpic_program/lpic_1 LPIC1] being first level. | [http://www.lpi.org/eng Linux Professional Institute] has various levels of certification with [http://www.lpi.org/eng/certification/the_lpic_program/lpic_1 LPIC1] being first level. | ||
== Humanity == | |||
[https://www.alanrutherfordlpc.com/resources/weakandstrongapologies Weak and Strong Apologies] | |||
== Grammar & Sentence Structure == | |||
[https://www.butte.edu/departments/cas/tipsheets/grammar/articles.html Definite (i.e., the) and Indefinite (i.e., a, an) Articles] | |||
== US Legal research == | |||
'''totality of circumstances''' ''put everything together and analyze the whole picture'' | |||
reasonable articulable facts | |||
Courts focus on: | |||
#specific | |||
#articulable | |||
#rational inferences | |||
* Do not use "suspicious" when describing the activity. Suspicious is the conclusion based on facts. | |||
* articulate facts that make an activity suspicious | |||
with specific articulable facts, what can a rational officer (or citizen) infer? | |||
Mental checklist: | |||
#What crime do you observe? What crime is about to be committed? Be very specific. | |||
#What facts do I see to support 1? | |||
#Take a step back, and ask yourself, "Is this more than a hunch?" | |||
Note: | |||
#Facts cannot include observations made after the stop. | |||
#Suspicion must be individualized, not general (i.e., "high crime area"). | |||
#United States v. Arivizu, 534 US 266 (2002) | |||
References: | |||
*Terry v. Ohio, 392 US 1 (1968) | |||
* United States v. Cortez, 449 US 441, 417-18 (1981) | |||
* Ornelas v. United States, 517 US 690 (1996) | |||
Latest revision as of 16:10, 9 September 2024
Creativity
Where have all the hackers gone?
Home Schooling
Scratch is a new programming language that makes it easy to create your own interactive stories, animations, games, music, and art -- and share your creations on the web.
Foundation for Economic Freedom courses
Reasons to home school
Open Classes
Free introductory DB Class. My notes on db-class.org.
Online Education Sites
Edx is a not-for-profit enterprise of its founding partners Harvard University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology that features learning designed specifically for interactive study via the web.
Certifications
Linux Professional Institute has various levels of certification with LPIC1 being first level.
Humanity
Grammar & Sentence Structure
Definite (i.e., the) and Indefinite (i.e., a, an) Articles
US Legal research
totality of circumstances put everything together and analyze the whole picture
reasonable articulable facts
Courts focus on:
- specific
- articulable
- rational inferences
- Do not use "suspicious" when describing the activity. Suspicious is the conclusion based on facts.
- articulate facts that make an activity suspicious
with specific articulable facts, what can a rational officer (or citizen) infer?
Mental checklist:
- What crime do you observe? What crime is about to be committed? Be very specific.
- What facts do I see to support 1?
- Take a step back, and ask yourself, "Is this more than a hunch?"
Note:
- Facts cannot include observations made after the stop.
- Suspicion must be individualized, not general (i.e., "high crime area").
- United States v. Arivizu, 534 US 266 (2002)
References:
- Terry v. Ohio, 392 US 1 (1968)
- United States v. Cortez, 449 US 441, 417-18 (1981)
- Ornelas v. United States, 517 US 690 (1996)